As artificial intelligence becomes more integrated into daily life, many prospective immigrants to Canada are turning to AI-driven tools for answers to complex immigration questions. While AI can provide quick responses, subtle legal updates and nuances often leave bots out of date—a reality that can lead to serious misinformation.
To test the accuracy of AI on immigration matters, Maple News conducted a practical experiment by asking a popular language model ten common immigration questions. One key example highlighted considerable flaws in AI-generated advice.
We asked: “Can I get more Comprehensive Ranking System (CRS) points through a Labour Market Impact Assessment (LMIA)?” The AI bot confidently answered yes, stating that a valid job offer supported by an LMIA could award 50 or 200 additional CRS points, depending on the position and meeting specific requirements.
However, this information is no longer accurate. As of March 25, 2025, Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada (IRCC) removed the bonus CRS points previously granted for arranged employment, including job offers backed by LMIAs. This policy change, introduced in late 2024, significantly alters how job offers are viewed within Canada’s Express Entry system.
Under the new rules, having a job offer—LMIA-supported or not—does not automatically enhance an applicant’s CRS score. This modification underscores the importance of relying on updated, official sources or qualified professionals for immigration decisions, rather than AI alone.
Maple News emphasizes the risk of placing full trust in automated tools when it comes to high-stakes legal processes. While AI can provide general insights, only expert consultations and government-sourced information can ensure accuracy.
As Canada’s immigration landscape continues to evolve rapidly, staying current on policy updates is essential. Maple News will continue monitoring these changes and providing reliable guidance to applicants navigating the Canadian immigration system.